Case Study: Turning One Failed Change Into Nine Hostages
Introducing Synergized Solo Execution: the bold new format where ten engineers clear their calendars so one of them can do the work.
We’re thrilled to share an exciting update to our security team’s operational cadence.
Starting this quarter, any time a single engineer needs to perform a routine tool change, the kind of task that historically took one person roughly twenty minutes, we will instead be blocking four hours on the calendars of the entire organization so that everyone can observe.
We call this new format “Synergized Solo Execution,” and we believe it represents a bold step forward in our commitment to Radical Transparency, Shared Ownership, and Calendar Utilization.
Why Watch One Person Work?
Great question. Historically, tool changes were performed quietly, efficiently, and without an audience: a practice we now recognize as a missed bonding opportunity. Under the new model:
- 10 engineers will clear their schedules
- 1 engineer will do the actual work
- 9 engineers will watch a shared screen in real time, occasionally asking “wait, go back” or “can you make the font bigger”
- The change will fail at least once, live, in front of everyone, giving the team a shared moment of collective vulnerability
- The remaining time will be spent troubleshooting the failure while the other nine narrate helpfully from the sidelines
This is what we mean when we say “we’re all in this together.” Specifically, nine of us are in this together while one of us is actually doing it.
Key Benefits
Knowledge Transfer. By having ten senior professionals watch a single terminal window for four hours, we ensure that knowledge is transferred at the industry-leading rate of one keystroke per eleven minutes.
Accountability. When something breaks, and per our own internal projections, it will, there’s tremendous value in nine witnesses instead of a Slack thread and a postmortem doc.
Calendar Optimization. Nothing says “we value your time” quite like scheduling a four hour block titled “Security Tool Change All Hands Required” for a task with a single clear owner and no actual dependencies on the other nine attendees.
What To Expect
- Hour 1: Excited energy. Someone shares their screen. Someone else asks if they can see it. They cannot. We figure it out… eventually.
- Hour 2: The change is initiated. It does not go as planned. A rollback is discussed. A rollback is not performed.
- Hour 3: A senior engineer who was not originally on the call joins to “just take a quick look,” stays for the remainder of the meeting.
- Hour 4: The change fails, right on schedule. The meeting, which was supposed to end, does not end.
- UPDATE, Hour 4: Great news! We’ve extended the session by an additional two hours, bringing our total to a tidy six hours, after the change failed exactly as projected. Leadership has decided that rather than release the other nine attendees to, say, do their actual jobs, everyone will instead remain on the call to bear witness as the engineer who pushed the change is gently, lovingly interrogated in real time. We’re calling this bonus segment ”The Hot Seat,” and we think it really ties the whole session together.
- Hour 5: The engineer who pushed the change is invited to “walk us through their thinking” while nine colleagues watch silently, occasionally unmuting to ask “did you consider” about something that was, in fact, considered.
- Hour 6: A root cause is identified. It is the thing that was flagged in the chat during hour one and ignored. The meeting ends. No one apologizes for the previous five hours.
The Hot Seat: A Bonus Segment
We want to be clear that The Hot Seat is not about blame. It is about learning as a team, which is why the learning is directed entirely at one person while the other nine take notes on how not to be the one in the hot seat next time. Studies show that public, extended, realtime accountability sessions are remembered fondly by all participants, especially the one at the center of them.
In Closing
We recognize that some team members may ask, “couldn’t this have been a five minute status update and a follow up ticket?” To this we say: sure, but where’s the togetherness in that?
We look forward to seeing everyone’s face in a tiny grid box while one of you does all the work. Attendance is, of course, mandatory.
This has been a message from Leadership. Please add any follow up questions to the meeting notes doc, which no one will read.